Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RWEBX
LQFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.89
Change+$0.88 (+5.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.61M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LQFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LQFLX (111M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RWEBX (0.78) vs LQFLX (0.03). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LQFLX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.99 vs. RWEBX (4.66). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. LQFLX (-0.33).
| LQFLX | RWEBX | LQFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.06 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.06 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.981 | 1.452 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.78 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.99 | 4.66 | 343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.49 | 27.48 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.33 | 33.53 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement