Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RWEBX
LQFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.27
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.24M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.91B
LQFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 212B vs. LQFLX (88.2M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RWEBX (0.74) vs LQFLX (0.00). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.12 vs. RWEBX (3.92). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.45 vs. LQFLX (3.84).
| LQFLX | RWEBX | LQFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.06 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.06 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.075 | 11.070 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.2M | 212B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.12 | 3.92 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.85 | 26.97 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.84 | 40.45 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement