Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMFCX
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.89
Change+$0.88 (+5.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LQFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LQFLX (111M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LQFLX (0.03). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LQFLX (7 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LQFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.99 vs. RMFCX (7.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. LQFLX (-0.33).
| LQFLX | RMFCX | LQFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.91 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.981 | 2.244 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.24 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.99 | 7.45 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.49 | 28.73 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.33 | 44.16 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement