Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.71M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LQFLX (86.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LQFLX (0.31). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RMEBX (6.55). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. LQFLX (4.11).
| LQFLX | RMEBX | LQFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.07 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.458 | 14.940 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.7M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.05 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 6.55 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.01 | 30.03 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.11 | 53.80 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement