Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LQFLX vs RMEBX
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LQFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
Price$15.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.42M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LQFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LQFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LQFLX (83.4M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LQFLX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LQFLX (0.00). LQFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LQFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LQFLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LQFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LQFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LQFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LQFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.81 vs. RMEBX (7.85). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.24 vs. LQFLX (4.07).
| LQFLX | RMEBX | LQFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.07 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.525 | 9.617 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.81 | 7.85 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.30 | 28.25 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.07 | 45.24 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement