Advertisement
LQDT vs W
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQDT is a Hold and W is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LQDT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LQDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- W’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LQDT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while W’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LQDT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- W’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LQDT (@Internet Retail) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while W (@Internet Retail) price change was -5.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
LQDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
W is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Retail (-2.87% weekly)The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.
| LQDT | W | LQDT / W | |
| Capitalization | 970M | 11.8B | 8% |
| EBITDA | 45.5M | 105M | 43% |
| Gain YTD | 3.926 | 4.292 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.18 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 477M | 12.2B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 186M | 1.23B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 13.8M | 3.61B | 0% |
LQDT | W | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LQDT's Valuation (76) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as W (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew similarly to W’s over the last 12 months.
LQDT's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for W (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than W’s over the last 12 months.
LQDT's SMR Rating (55) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for W (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than W’s over the last 12 months.
W's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as LQDT (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that W’s stock grew similarly to LQDT’s over the last 12 months.
LQDT's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as W (94) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LQDT’s stock grew similarly to W’s over the last 12 months.
| LQDT | W | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 73% | 9 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TMB | 25.67 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | |||
| LSAT | 39.10 | 0.04 | +0.10% |
| LeaderShares® AlphaFctr® Tctcl Fcsd ETF | |||
| GFEB | 41.91 | -0.09 | -0.21% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| FDLO | 68.27 | -0.38 | -0.55% |
| Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | |||
| FIVY | 27.68 | -0.16 | -0.59% |
| YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Inc ETF | |||
LQDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQDT has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQDT jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LQDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQDT | 100% | -3.49% | ||
| CVNA - LQDT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| RVLV - LQDT | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| SE - LQDT | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.75% | ||
| GLBE - LQDT | 27% Poorly correlated | -7.25% | ||
| W - LQDT | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
W and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, W has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if W jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.