LQDT
Price
$34.31
Change
-$1.23 (-3.46%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
74 days until earnings call
RVLV
Price
$28.61
Change
-$0.72 (-2.45%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.02B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LQDT vs RVLV

Header iconLQDT vs RVLV Comparison
Open Charts LQDT vs RVLVBanner chart's image
Liquidity Services
Price$34.31
Change-$1.23 (-3.46%)
Volume$385.59K
Capitalization1.06B
Revolve Group
Price$28.61
Change-$0.72 (-2.45%)
Volume$2.28M
Capitalization2.02B
LQDT vs RVLV Comparison Chart
Loading...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LQDT vs. RVLV commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQDT is a Buy and RVLV is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LQDT: $36.33 vs. RVLV: $31.25)
Brand notoriety: LQDT: Not notable vs. RVLV: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LQDT: 175% vs. RVLV: 95%
Market capitalization -- LQDT: $1.06B vs. RVLV: $2.02B
LQDT [@Internet Retail] is valued at $1.06B. RVLV’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $2.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.3T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $45.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LQDT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LQDT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RVLV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than RVLV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LQDT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LQDT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RVLV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the short-term than RVLV.

Price Growth

LQDT (@Internet Retail) experienced а +5.79% price change this week, while RVLV (@Internet Retail) price change was +3.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

LQDT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

RVLV is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.94% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RVLV($2.02B) has a higher market cap than LQDT($1.07B). RVLV has higher P/E ratio than LQDT: RVLV (50.19) vs LQDT (45.75). LQDT YTD gains are higher at: 12.512 vs. RVLV (-6.689). RVLV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.5M vs. LQDT (40.6M). RVLV has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. LQDT (139M). LQDT has less debt than RVLV: LQDT (13.4M) vs RVLV (42.5M). RVLV has higher revenues than LQDT: RVLV (1.09B) vs LQDT (414M).
LQDTRVLVLQDT / RVLV
Capitalization1.07B2.02B53%
EBITDA40.6M47.5M85%
Gain YTD12.512-6.689-187%
P/E Ratio45.7550.1991%
Revenue414M1.09B38%
Total Cash139M253M55%
Total Debt13.4M42.5M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LQDTRVLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LQDT and LOGC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQDT and LOGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
-0.41%
LOGC - LQDT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
DIBS - LQDT
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
JD - LQDT
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.97%
RVLV - LQDT
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
QRTEA - LQDT
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More

RVLV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RVLV has been loosely correlated with EBAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RVLV jumps, then EBAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLV
1D Price
Change %
RVLV100%
+0.48%
EBAY - RVLV
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
CHWY - RVLV
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
QRTEA - RVLV
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
DIBS - RVLV
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
TDUP - RVLV
28%
Poorly correlated
+11.65%
More