LPSIF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.24M
MIELY
Price
$44.74
Change
-$0.70 (-1.54%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.73B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LPSIF vs MIELY

Header iconLPSIF vs MIELY Comparison
Open Charts LPSIF vs MIELYBanner chart's image
Legend Power Systems
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9K
Capitalization9.24M
Mitsubishi Electric
Price$44.74
Change-$0.70 (-1.54%)
Volume$32.87K
Capitalization30.73B
LPSIF vs MIELY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LPSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIELY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LPSIF vs. MIELY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPSIF is a Hold and MIELY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LPSIF: $0.08 vs. MIELY: $44.74)
Brand notoriety: LPSIF and MIELY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LPSIF: 85% vs. MIELY: 30%
Market capitalization -- LPSIF: $9.24M vs. MIELY: $30.73B
LPSIF [@Electrical Products] is valued at $9.24M. MIELY’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $30.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $181.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $4.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LPSIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMIELY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LPSIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MIELY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MIELY is a better buy in the long-term than LPSIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LPSIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIELY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LPSIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MIELY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LPSIF and MIELY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LPSIF (@Electrical Products) experienced а -10.01% price change this week, while MIELY (@Electrical Products) price change was +7.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

MIELY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (+3.51% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIELY($30.7B) has a higher market cap than LPSIF($9.24M). MIELY YTD gains are higher at: 32.025 vs. LPSIF (-40.030). MIELY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 477B vs. LPSIF (-4.01M). MIELY has more cash in the bank: 672B vs. LPSIF (1.41M). LPSIF has less debt than MIELY: LPSIF (390K) vs MIELY (494B). MIELY has higher revenues than LPSIF: MIELY (4.86T) vs LPSIF (705K).
LPSIFMIELYLPSIF / MIELY
Capitalization9.24M30.7B0%
EBITDA-4.01M477B-0%
Gain YTD-40.03032.025-125%
P/E RatioN/A18.52-
Revenue705K4.86T0%
Total Cash1.41M672B0%
Total Debt390K494B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LPSIF vs MIELY: Fundamental Ratings
LPSIF
MIELY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7747
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10030
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MIELY's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as LPSIF (75). This means that MIELY’s stock grew similarly to LPSIF’s over the last 12 months.

MIELY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LPSIF (100). This means that MIELY’s stock grew significantly faster than LPSIF’s over the last 12 months.

LPSIF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as MIELY (100). This means that LPSIF’s stock grew similarly to MIELY’s over the last 12 months.

MIELY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LPSIF (64). This means that MIELY’s stock grew similarly to LPSIF’s over the last 12 months.

MIELY's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPSIF (100). This means that MIELY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPSIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LPSIFMIELY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LPSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIELY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APTL60.00N/A
N/A
Alaska Power & Telephone Co.
JCYCF19.79N/A
N/A
Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited
CYFWF2.64N/A
N/A
Cyfrowy Polsat S.A.
SNANF0.49N/A
-0.99%
Sona Nanotech Inc
ARREF1.70-0.05
-2.97%
Amerigo Resources Ltd.

LPSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LPSIF and VARGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LPSIF and VARGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPSIF
1D Price
Change %
LPSIF100%
N/A
VARGF - LPSIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGRVF - LPSIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
NVNXF - LPSIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LDGYY - LPSIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIELY - LPSIF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

MIELY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MIELY has been loosely correlated with MIELF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MIELY jumps, then MIELF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIELY
1D Price
Change %
MIELY100%
-1.54%
MIELF - MIELY
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.91%
YASKY - MIELY
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.13%
AEIS - MIELY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
PRYMY - MIELY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
NVT - MIELY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
More