LPLA
Price
$340.52
Change
+$4.00 (+1.19%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
27.24B
25 days until earnings call
MS
Price
$160.11
Change
+$1.16 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
255.59B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LPLA vs MS

Header iconLPLA vs MS Comparison
Open Charts LPLA vs MSBanner chart's image
LPL Financial Holdings
Price$340.52
Change+$4.00 (+1.19%)
Volume$480.7K
Capitalization27.24B
Morgan Stanley
Price$160.11
Change+$1.16 (+0.73%)
Volume$5.33M
Capitalization255.59B
LPLA vs MS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LPLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LPLA vs. MS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPLA is a Buy and MS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LPLA: $340.52 vs. MS: $160.11)
Brand notoriety: LPLA: Not notable vs. MS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LPLA: 53% vs. MS: 106%
Market capitalization -- LPLA: $27.24B vs. MS: $255.59B
LPLA [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $27.24B. MS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $255.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LPLA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMS’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • LPLA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than LPLA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LPLA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LPLA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LPLA is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

LPLA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

LPLA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($256B) has a higher market cap than LPLA($27.2B). LPLA has higher P/E ratio than MS: LPLA (23.34) vs MS (18.13). MS YTD gains are higher at: 30.128 vs. LPLA (4.560). LPLA (4.31B) and MS (4.29B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LPLA has less debt than MS: LPLA (7.34B) vs MS (352B). MS has higher revenues than LPLA: MS (61.5B) vs LPLA (14.1B).
LPLAMSLPLA / MS
Capitalization27.2B256B11%
EBITDA2.34BN/A-
Gain YTD4.56030.12815%
P/E Ratio23.3418.13129%
Revenue14.1B61.5B23%
Total Cash4.31B4.29B100%
Total Debt7.34B352B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LPLA vs MS: Fundamental Ratings
LPLA
MS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1040
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1412
SMR RATING
1..100
335
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPLA (95). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (14). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (33). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPLA (55). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPLA’s over the last 12 months.

LPLA's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (40). This means that LPLA’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LPLAMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LPLA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FATBP2.460.06
+2.50%
FAT Brands
HLMN9.170.11
+1.21%
Hillman Solutions Corp
NVMI309.762.81
+0.92%
Nova Ltd
IZEA3.780.03
+0.80%
IZEA Worldwide
TITN17.07-0.01
-0.06%
Titan Machinery

LPLA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPLA has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LPLA jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPLA
1D Price
Change %
LPLA100%
+1.19%
SF - LPLA
72%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
RJF - LPLA
70%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
MS - LPLA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
GS - LPLA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
SCHW - LPLA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
More

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
+0.73%
GS - MS
93%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
SF - MS
86%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
EVR - MS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
JEF - MS
83%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
RJF - MS
82%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
More