It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LPL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSONY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SONY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LPL (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -6.21% price change this week, while SONY (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +7.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.91%.
LPL is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
SONY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| LPL | SONY | LPL / SONY | |
| Capitalization | 4.66B | 181B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 5.74T | 2.77T | 207% |
| Gain YTD | 47.557 | 47.718 | 100% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.30 | - |
| Revenue | 26.31T | 13.01T | 202% |
| Total Cash | 1.68T | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 13.5T | N/A | - |
LPL | SONY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LPL's Valuation (5) in the Electronics Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for SONY (71) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew significantly faster than SONY’s over the last 12 months.
SONY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is significantly better than the same rating for LPL (100) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that SONY’s stock grew significantly faster than LPL’s over the last 12 months.
SONY's SMR Rating (56) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPL (93) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that SONY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPL’s over the last 12 months.
SONY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as LPL (52) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that SONY’s stock grew similarly to LPL’s over the last 12 months.
LPL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as SONY (12) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that LPL’s stock grew similarly to SONY’s over the last 12 months.
| LPL | SONY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 21 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 44% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPL has been loosely correlated with SONO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LPL jumps, then SONO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPL | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| SONO - LPL | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| TBCH - LPL | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| GPRO - LPL | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.46% | ||
| XIACF - LPL | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
| SONY - LPL | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.77% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SONY has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SONY jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SONY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONY | 100% | +3.77% | ||
| AAPL - SONY | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| TBCH - SONY | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| SONO - SONY | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| GPRO - SONY | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.46% | ||
| UEIC - SONY | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
More | ||||