Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs SMCWX
LPFCX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs SMCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.79M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$74.58
Change+$0.28 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
LPFCX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. SMCWX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. LPFCX (55.8M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: LPFCX (12.61) vs SMCWX (0.57). LPFCX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: LPFCX (15 years) vs SMCWX (35 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.04). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SMCWX (32.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: SMCWX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.79 vs. LPFCX (-3.44). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.79 vs. SMCWX (16.45).
| LPFCX | SMCWX | LPFCX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.04 | 319% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.04 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.636 | 10.707 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.8M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.61 | 0.57 | 2,199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 5.79 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.60 | 45.43 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.79 | 16.45 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.28 | 71.06 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers