Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLDX
LPFCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLDX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.04M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$76.35
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.6B
LPFCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. LPFCX (53M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: LPFCX (13.30) vs RSLDX (0.78). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLDX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. LPFCX (-7.93). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.56 vs. RSLDX (8.49).
| LPFCX | RSLDX | LPFCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 0.80 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 0.80 | 319% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.455 | 12.167 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.30 | 0.78 | 1,716% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.93 | 7.72 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.61 | 31.61 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.56 | 8.49 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement