Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLBX
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$4.42
Change-$1.11 (-20.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.56M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. LPFCX (49.6M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFCX (6.22) vs RSLBX (0.19). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFCX (16 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.74). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFCX (31.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. LPFCX (-18.46). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : -7.39 vs. RSLBX (-12.64).
| LPFCX | RSLBX | LPFCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.74 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 1.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.946 | 4.706 | -105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.6M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.22 | 0.19 | 3,240% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.46 | 11.64 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 20.82 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.39 | -12.64 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.49 | 82.58 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers