Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLBX
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$4.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.83M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.33
Change+$0.08 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. LPFCX (51.8M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFCX (13.37) vs RSLBX (0.05). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFCX (16 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.74). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. LPFCX (-15.95). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. RSLBX (-10.41).
| LPFCX | RSLBX | LPFCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.74 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 1.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.727 | 9.358 | -157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.8M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.37 | 0.05 | 24,356% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.95 | 8.07 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.76 | 31.42 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | -10.41 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.48 | 54.42 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement