Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSLBX
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.79M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
LPFCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. LPFCX (55.8M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFCX (12.61) vs RSLBX (0.06). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). LPFCX (3.41) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. LPFCX (-3.44). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.79 vs. RSLBX (10.42).
| LPFCX | RSLBX | LPFCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.32 | 1.75 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.41 | 1.75 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.636 | 10.130 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.8M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.61 | 0.06 | 22,342% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 5.03 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.60 | 42.38 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.79 | 10.42 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.28 | 53.27 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement