Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$4.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.83M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.62
Change+$0.10 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. LPFCX (51.8M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (13.37) vs RSEBX (0.22). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (16 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. LPFCX (-15.95). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. RSEBX (-7.56).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.45 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 1.45 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.727 | 10.173 | -145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.8M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.37 | 0.22 | 6,068% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.95 | 8.88 | -180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.76 | 33.19 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | -7.56 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.48 | 64.47 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement