Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$4.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.45M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. LPFCX (51.5M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (6.15) vs RSEBX (0.35). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (16 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. LPFCX (-7.42). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.61 vs. RSEBX (-7.15).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.45 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 1.45 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.935 | 4.180 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.15 | 0.35 | 1,764% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.42 | 14.90 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.06 | 27.74 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.61 | -7.15 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.60 | 90.71 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement