Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFCX vs RSEBX
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFCX vs RSEBX
ALPS Global Opportunity C
Price$5.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.04M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.51
Change+$0.16 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.6B
LPFCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. LPFCX (53M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: LPFCX (13.30) vs RSEBX (0.22). LPFCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: LPFCX (15 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). LPFCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). LPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: RSEBX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LPFCX (-7.93). LPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.56 vs. RSEBX (4.76).
| LPFCX | RSEBX | LPFCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.45 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.55 | 1.45 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.455 | 11.542 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.30 | 0.22 | 5,943% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.93 | 7.02 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.61 | 29.26 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.56 | 4.76 | 306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.80 | 58.21 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement