Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs SFCWX
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SFCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$5.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.45M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$78.16
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. LPFAX (51.5M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: LPFAX (5.24) vs SFCWX (1.04). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: LPFAX (8 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). LPFAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). LPFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: LPFAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.13 vs. LPFAX (-4.92). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.11 vs. SFCWX (-2.99).
| LPFAX | SFCWX | LPFAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.65 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.65 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.950 | 4.227 | 46% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.24 | 1.04 | 505% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.92 | 16.13 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.65 | 31.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.11 | -2.99 | -339% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement