Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs SFCWX
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SFCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$5.36
Change-$1.16 (-17.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.68M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$78.60
Change+$1.45 (+1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. LPFAX (47.7M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: LPFAX (5.30) vs SFCWX (1.00). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: LPFAX (8 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). LPFAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). SFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFAX (31.00). LPFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: LPFAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.84 vs. LPFAX (-16.36). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.67 vs. SFCWX (-5.67).
| LPFAX | SFCWX | LPFAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.65 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.65 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.965 | 4.814 | -103% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.7M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.30 | 1.00 | 528% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.36 | 13.84 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.88 | 25.94 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.67 | -5.67 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |