Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs SFCWX
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs SFCWX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.24
Change-$0.16 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.93
Change-$1.39 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.78B
LPFAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.8B vs. LPFAX (53.1M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: LPFAX (11.46) vs SFCWX (0.90). LPFAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: LPFAX (7 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). LPFAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). LPFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: LPFAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. LPFAX (-6.44). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.38 vs. SFCWX (9.26).
| LPFAX | SFCWX | LPFAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.65 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.65 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.775 | 12.305 | -6% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1M | 81.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.46 | 0.90 | 1,276% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.44 | 7.88 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 32.00 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.38 | 9.26 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement