Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs RSLDX
LPFAX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs RSLDX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$5.36
Change-$1.16 (-17.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.68M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$77.66
Change+$1.47 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
LPFAX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. RSLDX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. LPFAX (47.7M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: LPFAX (5.30) vs RSLDX (0.88). LPFAX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: LPFAX (8 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). LPFAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). RSLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFAX (31.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: RSLDX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. LPFAX (-16.36). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.67 vs. RSLDX (-6.36).
| LPFAX | RSLDX | LPFAX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.80 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.80 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.965 | 4.804 | -103% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.7M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.30 | 0.88 | 603% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.36 | 13.62 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.88 | 25.33 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.67 | -6.36 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.93 | - |