Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs RSLBX
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$6.36
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.15M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.1B
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. LPFAX (54.2M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFAX (11.09) vs RSLBX (0.06). LPFAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFAX (7 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). LPFAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). LPFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. LPFAX (-4.59). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.70 vs. RSLBX (2.96).
| LPFAX | RSLBX | LPFAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.75 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.75 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.085 | 10.410 | -10% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.2M | 81.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.09 | 0.06 | 19,787% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.59 | 5.47 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.39 | 40.05 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.70 | 2.96 | 969% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.38 | - |