Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LPFAX vs RSLBX
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts LPFAX vs RSLBX
ALPS Global Opportunity A
Price$5.36
Change-$1.16 (-17.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.68M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
LPFAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LPFAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPFAX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. LPFAX (47.7M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: LPFAX (5.30) vs RSLBX (0.19). LPFAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: LPFAX (8 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). LPFAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.74). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFAX (31.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: RSLBX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. LPFAX (-16.36). LPFAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.67 vs. RSLBX (-12.64).
| LPFAX | RSLBX | LPFAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.74 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.74 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.965 | 4.706 | -105% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.7M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.30 | 0.19 | 2,762% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.36 | 11.64 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.88 | 20.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.67 | -12.64 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers