Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOWV vs RECS
LOWV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LOWV vs RECS
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Price$78.08
Change+$0.46 (+0.59%)
Volume$100
Net Assets153.24M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.04
Change+$0.22 (+0.55%)
Volume$150
Net Assets3.8B
LOWV vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOWV vs. RECS commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOWV is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.8B vs. LOWV (153M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LOWV: RECS (15.668) vs LOWV (11.574). LOWV was incepted earlier than RECS: LOWV (3 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LOWV (0.39). RECS has a higher turnover LOWV (30.00) vs LOWV (30.00).
| LOWV | RECS | LOWV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.574 | 15.668 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 153M | 3.8B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.15 | 260% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 49.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.93 | 0.62 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LOWV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LOWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LOWV and CMPGY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LOWV and CMPGY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOWV | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| CMPGY - LOWV | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXPGY - LOWV | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MMC - LOWV | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| ORLY - LOWV | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
| V - LOWV | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||