LOW
Price
$258.17
Change
+$0.42 (+0.16%)
Updated
Dec 18, 01:53 PM (EDT)
70 days until earnings call
WFAFY
Price
$23.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

LOW vs WFAFY

Header iconLOW vs WFAFY Comparison
Open Charts LOW vs WFAFYBanner chart's image
Lowe's Companies
Price$258.17
Change+$0.42 (+0.16%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
Wesfarmers
Price$23.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.77K
CapitalizationN/A
LOW vs WFAFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOW vs. WFAFY commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOW is a Hold and WFAFY is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LOW: $257.75 vs. WFAFY: $23.42)
Brand notoriety: LOW: Notable vs. WFAFY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOW: 103% vs. WFAFY: 46%
Market capitalization -- LOW: $145.75B vs. WFAFY: $37.89B
LOW [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $145.75B. WFAFY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $37.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOW’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFAFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LOW’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WFAFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than WFAFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFAFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFAFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LOW and WFAFY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LOW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -4.58% price change this week, while WFAFY (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.53% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($146B) has a higher market cap than WFAFY($37.9B). WFAFY has higher P/E ratio than LOW: WFAFY (22.17) vs LOW (18.88). WFAFY YTD gains are higher at: 24.784 vs. LOW (18.021). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. WFAFY (5.33B). LOW has higher revenues than WFAFY: LOW (86.4B) vs WFAFY (41.5B).
LOWWFAFYLOW / WFAFY
Capitalization146B37.9B385%
EBITDA13.6B5.33B255%
Gain YTD18.02124.78473%
P/E Ratio18.8822.1785%
Revenue86.4B41.5B208%
Total Cash921MN/A-
Total Debt40.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOW vs WFAFY: Fundamental Ratings
LOW
WFAFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5486
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1621
SMR RATING
1..100
897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOW's Valuation (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as WFAFY (18) in the null industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to WFAFY’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as WFAFY (21) in the null industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to WFAFY’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's SMR Rating (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for WFAFY (97) in the null industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew significantly faster than WFAFY’s over the last 12 months.

WFAFY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as LOW (51) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that WFAFY’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as WFAFY (48) in the null industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to WFAFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOWWFAFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
-0.90%
HD - LOW
83%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
PAG - LOW
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
CWH - LOW
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
LAD - LOW
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
WSM - LOW
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
More

WFAFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFAFY has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WFAFY jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFAFY
1D Price
Change %
WFAFY100%
-0.01%
PAG - WFAFY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
BBWI - WFAFY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
WSM - WFAFY
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
KAR - WFAFY
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
LOW - WFAFY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More