It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LOW’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileTSCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LOW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LOW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -4.58% price change this week, while TSCO (@Specialty Stores) price change was -3.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.35%.
LOW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
TSCO is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
LOW | TSCO | LOW / TSCO | |
Capitalization | 146B | 27.9B | 523% |
EBITDA | 13.6B | 1.87B | 726% |
Gain YTD | 18.021 | 30.116 | 60% |
P/E Ratio | 18.88 | 25.59 | 74% |
Revenue | 86.4B | 14.6B | 592% |
Total Cash | 921M | 397M | 232% |
Total Debt | 40.1B | 5.04B | 796% |
LOW | TSCO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOW's Valuation (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSCO (62) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSCO’s over the last 12 months.
TSCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LOW (16) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that TSCO’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's SMR Rating (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as TSCO (19) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to TSCO’s over the last 12 months.
TSCO's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LOW (51) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that TSCO’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as TSCO (36) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to TSCO’s over the last 12 months.
LOW | TSCO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 3 days ago54% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 3 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 3 days ago54% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 3 days ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago64% | 8 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 13 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 3 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSCO has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSCO jumps, then FND could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TSCO | 100% | -0.47% | ||
FND - TSCO | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
HD - TSCO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
LOW - TSCO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
LESL - TSCO | 41% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
KMX - TSCO | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
More |