LOW
Price
$225.27
Change
-$2.32 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
145.75B
73 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$164.78
Change
+$2.11 (+1.30%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOW vs PAG

Header iconLOW vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts LOW vs PAGBanner chart's image
Lowe's Companies
Price$225.27
Change-$2.32 (-1.02%)
Volume$2.22M
Capitalization145.75B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$164.78
Change+$2.11 (+1.30%)
Volume$293.23K
Capitalization10.86B
LOW vs PAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOW vs. PAG commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOW is a Buy and PAG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LOW: $224.52 vs. PAG: $163.14)
Brand notoriety: LOW: Notable vs. PAG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOW: 82% vs. PAG: 48%
Market capitalization -- LOW: $145.75B vs. PAG: $10.86B
LOW [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $145.75B. PAG’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $10.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LOW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than PAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

LOW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while PAG (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.34% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($146B) has a higher market cap than PAG($10.9B). LOW has higher P/E ratio than PAG: LOW (18.88) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 8.668 vs. LOW (-8.148). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. PAG (1.79B). LOW has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. PAG (96.4M). PAG has less debt than LOW: PAG (7.74B) vs LOW (40.1B). LOW has higher revenues than PAG: LOW (86.4B) vs PAG (29.5B).
LOWPAGLOW / PAG
Capitalization146B10.9B1,339%
EBITDA13.6B1.79B761%
Gain YTD-8.1488.668-94%
P/E Ratio18.8810.37182%
Revenue86.4B29.5B293%
Total Cash921M96.4M955%
Total Debt40.1B7.74B518%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOW vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
LOW
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
677
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
255
SMR RATING
1..100
848
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOW's Valuation (2) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAG (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LOW (25) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's SMR Rating (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAG (48) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LOW (59) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LOW (40) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOWPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
-0.57%
HD - LOW
88%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
FND - LOW
67%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
PAG - LOW
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
ASO - LOW
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
WSM - LOW
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.63%
ABG - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
GPI - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
AN - PAG
77%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
LAD - PAG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
SAH - PAG
69%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More