It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LOW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LOW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LOW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.52% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.93%.
LOW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
LOW | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOW | NOBL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago65% | 5 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOBL has been closely correlated with BEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOBL jumps, then BEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL | 100% | -0.79% | ||
BEN - NOBL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
FRT - NOBL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
LOW - NOBL | 67% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
PPG - NOBL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
ATO - NOBL | 66% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
More |