Advertisement
LOW vs NOBL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOW is a Hold and NOBL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LOW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- LOW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LOW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LOW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -2.22% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-1.68% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
LOW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LOW | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 12 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ETHA | 26.92 | 1.04 | +4.02% |
| iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | |||
| TSL | 13.09 | 0.50 | +3.97% |
| GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | |||
| FNY | 84.31 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| TRTY | 26.43 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| Cambria Trinity ETF | |||
| PRFZ | 41.88 | -0.19 | -0.46% |
| Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | |||
LOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.
NOBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOBL has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOBL jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOBL | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIN - NOBL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| SPGI - NOBL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| BEN - NOBL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| FRT - NOBL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| LOW - NOBL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||