Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOUP vs SMH
LOUP vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts LOUP vs SMH
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
Price$76.15
Change-$3.68 (-4.61%)
Volume$23.12K
Net Assets163.68M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$344.82
Change-$10.71 (-3.01%)
Volume$10.65M
Net Assets37.62B
LOUP vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOUP vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOUP is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. LOUP (164M). LOUP has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: LOUP (49.659) vs SMH (46.810). LOUP was incepted earlier than SMH: LOUP (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than LOUP (0.70). LOUP has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| LOUP | SMH | LOUP / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 49.659 | 46.810 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 164M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.35 | 200% |
| Turnover | 165.00 | 15.00 | 1,100% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LOUP | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 88% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LOUP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOUP has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOUP jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOUP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOUP | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| VRT - LOUP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| MU - LOUP | 75% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| LRCX - LOUP | 74% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| CLS - LOUP | 73% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| ANET - LOUP | 73% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||