LOQPF
Price
$4.56
Change
-$0.28 (-5.79%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
167.68M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCAP
Price
$15.00
Change
+$2.29 (+18.02%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
367.97M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOQPF vs MCAP

Header iconLOQPF vs MCAP Comparison
Open Charts LOQPF vs MCAPBanner chart's image
Accesso Technology Group
Price$4.56
Change-$0.28 (-5.79%)
Volume$100
Capitalization167.68M
MCAP
Price$15.00
Change+$2.29 (+18.02%)
Volume$101
Capitalization367.97M
LOQPF vs MCAP Comparison Chart in %
LOQPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOQPF vs. MCAP commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOQPF is a Hold and MCAP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LOQPF: $4.56 vs. MCAP: $15.00)
Brand notoriety: LOQPF and MCAP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOQPF: 9% vs. MCAP: 54%
Market capitalization -- LOQPF: $167.68M vs. MCAP: $367.97M
LOQPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $167.68M. MCAP’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $367.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $294.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOQPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LOQPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCAP is a better buy in the long-term than LOQPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOQPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOQPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCAP is a better buy in the short-term than LOQPF.

Price Growth

LOQPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.80% price change this week, while MCAP (@Packaged Software) price change was +18.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCAP($368M) has a higher market cap than LOQPF($168M). MCAP YTD gains are higher at: 190.667 vs. LOQPF (-31.839).
LOQPFMCAPLOQPF / MCAP
Capitalization168M368M46%
EBITDAN/A-1.39M-
Gain YTD-31.839190.667-17%
P/E Ratio18.51N/A-
RevenueN/A2.14M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOQPF vs MCAP: Fundamental Ratings
LOQPF
MCAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9643
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8880
SMR RATING
1..100
5799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCAP's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOQPF (71). This means that MCAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOQPF’s over the last 12 months.

MCAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as LOQPF (88). This means that MCAP’s stock grew similarly to LOQPF’s over the last 12 months.

LOQPF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCAP (99). This means that LOQPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCAP’s over the last 12 months.

MCAP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOQPF (88). This means that MCAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOQPF’s over the last 12 months.

LOQPF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MCAP (100). This means that LOQPF’s stock grew similarly to MCAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOQPFMCAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOQPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAFCX21.240.09
+0.43%
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
MUEAX40.980.01
+0.02%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity A
MMNJX17.14-0.01
-0.06%
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq Y
JSPJX23.94-0.02
-0.08%
Jackson Square Large-Cap Growth Inv
IASMX19.88-0.03
-0.15%
Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus

LOQPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LOQPF and TAPM have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LOQPF and TAPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOQPF
1D Price
Change %
LOQPF100%
-5.79%
TAPM - LOQPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCAP - LOQPF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTHRF - LOQPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTHRY - LOQPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+14.69%
GAME - LOQPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More

MCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCAP has been loosely correlated with ADBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCAP jumps, then ADBE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCAP
1D Price
Change %
MCAP100%
N/A
ADBE - MCAP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
EVCM - MCAP
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
ULY - MCAP
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.94%
LOQPF - MCAP
17%
Poorly correlated
-5.79%
MITI - MCAP
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.86%
More