LOMLF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
58.32M
LUGDF
Price
$65.03
Change
-$0.83 (-1.26%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
15.75B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOMLF vs LUGDF

Header iconLOMLF vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts LOMLF vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Lion One Metals
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization58.32M
Lundin Gold
Price$65.03
Change-$0.83 (-1.26%)
Volume$34.41K
Capitalization15.75B
LOMLF vs LUGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOMLF vs. LUGDF commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMLF is a Hold and LUGDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LOMLF: $0.20 vs. LUGDF: $65.04)
Brand notoriety: LOMLF and LUGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOMLF: 188% vs. LUGDF: 39%
Market capitalization -- LOMLF: $58.32M vs. LUGDF: $15.75B
LOMLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $58.32M. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LOMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LOMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than LOMLF.

Price Growth

LOMLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.58% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.36% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($15.7B) has a higher market cap than LOMLF($58.3M). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 217.785 vs. LOMLF (10.156). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 83M vs. LOMLF (12.9M). LOMLF has less debt than LUGDF: LOMLF (51.8M) vs LUGDF (298M).
LOMLFLUGDFLOMLF / LUGDF
Capitalization58.3M15.7B0%
EBITDA3.56MN/A-
Gain YTD10.156217.7855%
P/E RatioN/A25.60-
Revenue51MN/A-
Total Cash12.9M83M16%
Total Debt51.8M298M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMLF vs LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
LOMLF
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6687
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
9519
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10036
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMLF (27). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOMLF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOMLF (95). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as LOMLF (58). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMLF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMLFLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRRX17.00N/A
N/A
Integrated Rail and Resources Acquisition Corp.
FCHRF78.60N/A
N/A
GEORG FISCHER AG
BHSIF0.03N/A
-0.68%
Bayhorse Silver, Inc.
UBLXF168.84-2.17
-1.27%
U-Blox Holding AG
BNKHF4.70-0.15
-3.09%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.

LOMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMLF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMLF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMLF
1D Price
Change %
LOMLF100%
-4.27%
KNTNF - LOMLF
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
LUGDF - LOMLF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
NESRF - LOMLF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
TORXF - LOMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
STLRF - LOMLF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
More

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
-1.27%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More