LOMA
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.15 (-1.64%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
58 days until earnings call
MLM
Price
$622.64
Change
+$3.67 (+0.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
37.55B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOMA vs MLM

Header iconLOMA vs MLM Comparison
Open Charts LOMA vs MLMBanner chart's image
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$9.00
Change-$0.15 (-1.64%)
Volume$702.82K
Capitalization1.07B
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$622.64
Change+$3.67 (+0.59%)
Volume$311.2K
Capitalization37.55B
LOMA vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOMA vs. MLM commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMA is a Hold and MLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LOMA: $9.00 vs. MLM: $622.64)
Brand notoriety: LOMA and MLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOMA: 146% vs. MLM: 80%
Market capitalization -- LOMA: $1.07B vs. MLM: $37.55B
LOMA [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.07B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $37.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LOMA and MLM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

LOMA (@Construction Materials) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($37.5B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.07B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than LOMA: MLM (34.48) vs LOMA (27.62). MLM YTD gains are higher at: 21.085 vs. LOMA (-24.623). MLM has less debt than LOMA: MLM (5.81B) vs LOMA (275B).
LOMAMLMLOMA / MLM
Capitalization1.07B37.5B3%
EBITDA157BN/A-
Gain YTD-24.62321.085-117%
P/E Ratio27.6234.4880%
Revenue667BN/A-
Total Cash15.9BN/A-
Total Debt275B5.81B4,734%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMA vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
LOMA
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5581
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4115
SMR RATING
1..100
6963
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6519
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (90). This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (41). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (63) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (69). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (65). This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (8). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMAMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGPMX17.010.21
+1.25%
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Investor
SMINX13.260.11
+0.84%
SEI Tax-Managed Intl Mgd Vol F (SIMT)
JEMWX37.17N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R6
EIDIX18.41N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Global Equity Income I
RCSIX13.61-0.01
-0.07%
RBC Small Cap Core I

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-1.64%
CX - LOMA
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
KNF - LOMA
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
CRH - LOMA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
MLM - LOMA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
More

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+0.59%
VMC - MLM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
EXP - MLM
74%
Closely correlated
+4.14%
KNF - MLM
67%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
CRH - MLM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
BCC - MLM
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
More