LOMA
Price
$10.86
Change
-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.32B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLM
Price
$669.40
Change
-$1.76 (-0.26%)
Updated
Feb 5, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.48B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOMA vs MLM

Header iconLOMA vs MLM Comparison
Open Charts LOMA vs MLMBanner chart's image
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$10.86
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.32B
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$669.40
Change-$1.76 (-0.26%)
Volume$40
Capitalization40.48B
LOMA vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
LOMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOMA vs. MLM commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOMA is a Hold and MLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (LOMA: $10.89 vs. MLM: $671.17)
Brand notoriety: LOMA and MLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOMA: 100% vs. MLM: 127%
Market capitalization -- LOMA: $1.32B vs. MLM: $40.48B
LOMA [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.32B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $40.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $82.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than LOMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

LOMA (@Construction Materials) experienced а -9.63% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.39% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($40.5B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.32B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than MLM: LOMA (190.65) vs MLM (34.49). MLM YTD gains are higher at: 7.791 vs. LOMA (-15.907). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.9B vs. MLM (2.32B). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. MLM (57M). MLM has less debt than LOMA: MLM (5.9B) vs LOMA (400B). LOMA has higher revenues than MLM: LOMA (636B) vs MLM (6.9B).
LOMAMLMLOMA / MLM
Capitalization1.32B40.5B3%
EBITDA24.9B2.32B1,072%
Gain YTD-15.9077.791-204%
P/E Ratio190.6534.49553%
Revenue636B6.9B9,213%
Total Cash115B57M201,754%
Total Debt400B5.9B6,776%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMA vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
LOMA
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5120
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4720
SMR RATING
1..100
8563
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7626
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (6) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (87). This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (47). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (63) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (85). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (76). This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (9). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMAMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARYNX13.940.12
+0.87%
American Century Global Real Estate I
SCHLX43.230.28
+0.65%
DWS Health and Wellness S
FMCAX45.90N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp M
MIGNX42.56-0.26
-0.61%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R6
JAMFX5.52-0.09
-1.60%
Jacob Internet Inv

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-2.33%
CX - LOMA
56%
Loosely correlated
-5.10%
CPAC - LOMA
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
CRH - LOMA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
KNF - LOMA
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.37%
MLM - LOMA
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
More

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+1.23%
VMC - MLM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
EXP - MLM
74%
Closely correlated
+4.45%
KNF - MLM
68%
Closely correlated
+5.37%
CRH - MLM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
BCC - MLM
54%
Loosely correlated
+6.24%
More