Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOGWX vs WCMLX
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LOGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F3
Price$35.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
LOGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (44.7M). LOGWX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LOGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LOGWX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LOGWX (0.59). LOGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LOGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LOGWX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LOGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.34 vs. WCMLX (8.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.02 vs. LOGWX (-12.36).
| LOGWX | WCMLX | LOGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.99 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.79 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.306 | 9.487 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 44.7M | 4,591% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.34 | 8.14 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.27 | 33.08 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.36 | -4.02 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement