LOGN
Price
$30.25
Change
+$0.25 (+0.83%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
20.66M
LUMB
Price
$14.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
33.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOGN vs LUMB

Header iconLOGN vs LUMB Comparison
Open Charts LOGN vs LUMBBanner chart's image
Logansport Financial
Price$30.25
Change+$0.25 (+0.83%)
Volume$200
Capitalization20.66M
Lumbee Guaranty Bank
Price$14.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$103
Capitalization33.74M
LOGN vs LUMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LOGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOGN vs. LUMB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOGN is a Hold and LUMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LOGN: $30.25 vs. LUMB: $14.00)
Brand notoriety: LOGN and LUMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOGN: 38% vs. LUMB: 70%
Market capitalization -- LOGN: $20.66M vs. LUMB: $33.74M
LOGN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.66M. LUMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $33.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOGN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLUMB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LOGN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LUMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUMB is a better buy in the long-term than LOGN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOGN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUMB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOGN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LUMB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUMB is a better buy in the short-term than LOGN.

Price Growth

LOGN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while LUMB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUMB($33.7M) has a higher market cap than LOGN($20.7M). LOGN has higher P/E ratio than LUMB: LOGN (6.53) vs LUMB (6.20). LUMB YTD gains are higher at: 9.295 vs. LOGN (7.148). LUMB has less debt than LOGN: LUMB (39K) vs LOGN (31.6M). LUMB has higher revenues than LOGN: LUMB (17.7M) vs LOGN (9.74M).
LOGNLUMBLOGN / LUMB
Capitalization20.7M33.7M61%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.1489.29577%
P/E Ratio6.536.20105%
Revenue9.74M17.7M55%
Total CashN/A5.08M-
Total Debt31.6M39K81,026%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOGN: Fundamental Ratings
LOGN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOGNLUMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAIHF0.28N/A
N/A
Chia Tai Enterprises International Ltd.
NDMCF0.03N/A
N/A
New Destiny Mining Corp.
OXBDF4.23N/A
N/A
Oxford Biomedica PLC
SSDOF18.17N/A
N/A
Shiseido Company, Ltd.
SNROF45.90-0.36
-0.78%
Sanrio Co. Ltd.

LOGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LOGN and WVFC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LOGN and WVFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOGN
1D Price
Change %
LOGN100%
N/A
WVFC - LOGN
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZNL - LOGN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSBI - LOGN
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - LOGN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUMB - LOGN
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LUMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUMB has been loosely correlated with CRZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUMB jumps, then CRZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUMB
1D Price
Change %
LUMB100%
N/A
CRZY - LUMB
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TYCB - LUMB
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MBLU - LUMB
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHPF - LUMB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOB - LUMB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More