Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOFLX vs RWMHX
LOFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LOFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
Price$15.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.42M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.75
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
LOFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOFLX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LOFLX (83.4M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LOFLX: RWMHX (1.30) vs LOFLX (0.00). LOFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LOFLX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LOFLX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LOFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LOFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LOFLX (0) vs RWMHX (250). LOFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.04 vs. RWMHX (6.35). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. LOFLX (6.03).
| LOFLX | RWMHX | LOFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.41 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.41 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.651 | 8.199 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.04 | 6.35 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.14 | 32.68 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.03 | 41.75 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement