Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LOFLX vs RMFCX
LOFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LOFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
Price$15.32
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.9M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
LOFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LOFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LOFLX (66.9M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LOFLX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LOFLX (0.80). LOFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LOFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LOFLX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LOFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LOFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LOFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LOFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. RMFCX (6.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. LOFLX (21.32).
| LOFLX | RMFCX | LOFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.237 | 13.245 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.9M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.09 | 6.41 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 42.10 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.32 | 63.20 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement