LOBO
Price
$0.99
Change
-$0.14 (-12.39%)
Updated
Oct 17, 12:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.44M
VFS
Price
$3.24
Change
-$0.05 (-1.52%)
Updated
Oct 17, 01:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.69B
Earnings call today
Interact to see
Advertisement

LOBO vs VFS

Header iconLOBO vs VFS Comparison
Open Charts LOBO vs VFSBanner chart's image
Lobo Technologies
Price$0.99
Change-$0.14 (-12.39%)
Volume$360
Capitalization13.44M
VinFast Auto
Price$3.24
Change-$0.05 (-1.52%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization7.69B
LOBO vs VFS Comparison Chart in %
LOBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOBO vs. VFS commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOBO is a Hold and VFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LOBO: $1.13 vs. VFS: $3.29)
Brand notoriety: LOBO and VFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOBO: 2166% vs. VFS: 99%
Market capitalization -- LOBO: $13.44M vs. VFS: $7.69B
LOBO [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $13.44M. VFS’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $7.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $38.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOBO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LOBO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LOBO and VFS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOBO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOBO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VFS is a better buy in the short-term than LOBO.

Price Growth

LOBO (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +43.00% price change this week, while VFS (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

VFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-1.01% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFS($7.7B) has a higher market cap than LOBO($13.4M). VFS YTD gains are higher at: -18.362 vs. LOBO (-37.396). LOBO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -552.21K vs. VFS (-53.35T). VFS has more cash in the bank: 16.28T vs. LOBO (1.42M). LOBO has less debt than VFS: LOBO (3.39M) vs VFS (82.62T). VFS has higher revenues than LOBO: VFS (61.74T) vs LOBO (21.1M).
LOBOVFSLOBO / VFS
Capitalization13.4M7.7B0%
EBITDA-552.21K-53.35T0%
Gain YTD-37.396-18.362204%
P/E Ratio8125.00N/A-
Revenue21.1M61.74T0%
Total Cash1.42M16.28T0%
Total Debt3.39M82.62T0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOBOVFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOBO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSECX11.26N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq C
SUWIX38.53-0.25
-0.64%
DWS Core Equity Inst
VIVAX72.08-0.72
-0.99%
Vanguard Value Index Inv
HILVX23.08-0.26
-1.11%
Harbor Large Cap Value Inv
QSMNX19.81-0.50
-2.46%
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style N

LOBO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LOBO and GGR have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LOBO and GGR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOBO
1D Price
Change %
LOBO100%
+21.51%
GGR - LOBO
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
LOT - LOBO
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.17%
VFS - LOBO
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
PSNYW - LOBO
7%
Poorly correlated
+54.39%
AIIO - LOBO
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.78%
More

VFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFS has been loosely correlated with RIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFS jumps, then RIVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VFS
1D Price
Change %
VFS100%
+2.17%
RIVN - VFS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.73%
TSLA - VFS
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
LCID - VFS
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.26%
STLA - VFS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
ZK - VFS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More