LOB
Price
$48.55
Change
+$0.08 (+0.17%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
68 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$29.62
Change
-$0.19 (-0.64%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LOB vs SBCF

Header iconLOB vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts LOB vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Live Oak Bancshares
Price$48.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
Volume$277.17K
CapitalizationN/A
Seacoast Banking
Price$29.62
Change-$0.19 (-0.64%)
Volume$677.51K
CapitalizationN/A
LOB vs SBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LOB vs. SBCF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LOB is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (LOB: $48.47 vs. SBCF: $29.81)
Brand notoriety: LOB and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LOB: 139% vs. SBCF: 95%
Market capitalization -- LOB: $1.86B vs. SBCF: $2.1B
LOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.86B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LOB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LOB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOB is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LOB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOB is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

LOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.04% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.1B) has a higher market cap than LOB($1.86B). LOB has higher P/E ratio than SBCF: LOB (24.73) vs SBCF (20.13). SBCF (7.093) and LOB (6.777) have similar YTD gains . LOB has more cash in the bank: 535M vs. SBCF (168M). LOB has less debt than SBCF: LOB (23.4M) vs SBCF (156M). SBCF has higher revenues than LOB: SBCF (567M) vs LOB (434M).
LOBSBCFLOB / SBCF
Capitalization1.86B2.1B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.7777.09396%
P/E Ratio24.7320.13123%
Revenue434M567M77%
Total Cash535M168M318%
Total Debt23.4M156M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOB vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
LOB
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
918
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6270
SMR RATING
1..100
1512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6254
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (94). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

LOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (70). This means that LOB’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (15). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (41). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (62). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOBSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

LOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOB has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOB jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOB
1D Price
Change %
LOB100%
-0.14%
SBCF - LOB
83%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
FBNC - LOB
82%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
UCB - LOB
81%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
TOWN - LOB
81%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
UBSI - LOB
81%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
-0.37%
ABCB - SBCF
92%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
UCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
WSFS - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
PPBI - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
UBSI - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
More