LNZA
Price
$0.58
Change
+$0.01 (+1.75%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
583.14M
TSPCF
Price
$1.92
Change
-$0.01 (-0.52%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNZA vs TSPCF

Header iconLNZA vs TSPCF Comparison
Open Charts LNZA vs TSPCFBanner chart's image
LanzaTech Global
Price$0.58
Change+$0.01 (+1.75%)
Volume$8.76M
Capitalization583.14M
Cleanaway Waste Management
Price$1.92
Change-$0.01 (-0.52%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization4.09B
LNZA vs TSPCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNZA vs. TSPCF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a Buy and TSPCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LNZA: $0.58 vs. TSPCF: $1.92)
Brand notoriety: LNZA and TSPCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNZA: 271% vs. TSPCF: 47%
Market capitalization -- LNZA: $583.14M vs. TSPCF: $4.09B
LNZA [@Environmental Services] is valued at $583.14M. TSPCF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $4.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNZA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSPCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LNZA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LNZA and TSPCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNZA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSPCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNZA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSPCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSPCF is a better buy in the short-term than LNZA.

Price Growth

LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а +88.24% price change this week, while TSPCF (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+3.39% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSPCF($4.09B) has a higher market cap than LNZA($583M). TSPCF YTD gains are higher at: 17.073 vs. LNZA (-57.489). TSPCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 527M vs. LNZA (-100.93M). LNZA has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. TSPCF (69.4M). LNZA has less debt than TSPCF: LNZA (19.9M) vs TSPCF (1.07B). TSPCF has higher revenues than LNZA: TSPCF (3.38B) vs LNZA (62.6M).
LNZATSPCFLNZA / TSPCF
Capitalization583M4.09B14%
EBITDA-100.93M527M-19%
Gain YTD-57.48917.073-337%
P/E RatioN/A75.76-
Revenue62.6M3.38B2%
Total Cash121M69.4M174%
Total Debt19.9M1.07B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSPCF: Fundamental Ratings
TSPCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNZATSPCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OARK9.170.09
+0.99%
YieldMax ARKK Option Income Strategy ETF
XPAY54.880.15
+0.27%
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
VTEC96.700.09
+0.09%
Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
PIO44.78-0.03
-0.07%
Invesco Global Water ETF
EZJ44.22-1.07
-2.37%
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNZA and QRHC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNZA and QRHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
+2.18%
QRHC - LNZA
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
PESI - LNZA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
NVRI - LNZA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWST - LNZA
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
CLH - LNZA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

TSPCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSPCF and LNZA have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSPCF and LNZA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSPCF
1D Price
Change %
TSPCF100%
-0.52%
LNZA - TSPCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
ROOOF - TSPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
AMBI - TSPCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGXXF - TSPCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWAV - TSPCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
More