Advertisement
LNZA vs SMAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a Hold and SMAP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNZA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- LNZA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNZA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LNZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -3.74% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.38%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+1.86% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| LNZA | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
Advertisement
LNZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZA | 100% | +3.15% | ||
| HAIUF - LNZA | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ABAT - LNZA | 27% Poorly correlated | +7.14% | ||
| CLH - LNZA | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MLAC - LNZA | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PESI - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | -10.38% | ||
More | ||||
SMAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMAP and CXAI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMAP and CXAI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAP | 100% | N/A | ||
| CXAI - SMAP | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| TRON - SMAP | 20% Poorly correlated | -13.10% | ||
| JWSMF - SMAP | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SZZLU - SMAP | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LNZA - SMAP | -8% Poorly correlated | +3.15% |