It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNZA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQRHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNZA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QRHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -30.32% price change this week, while QRHC (@Environmental Services) price change was -12.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.04%.
LNZA is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2023.
QRHC is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
LNZA | QRHC | LNZA / QRHC | |
Capitalization | 583M | 171M | 341% |
EBITDA | -100.93M | 12.8M | -789% |
Gain YTD | -73.956 | -2.865 | 2,581% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 62.50 | - |
Revenue | 62.6M | 288M | 22% |
Total Cash | 121M | 324K | 37,346% |
Total Debt | 19.9M | 67.6M | 29% |
QRHC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNZA | QRHC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LNZA and QRHC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNZA and QRHC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LNZA | 100% | -7.09% | ||
QRHC - LNZA | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
CWST - LNZA | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
CLH - LNZA | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
TSPCF - LNZA | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PESI - LNZA | 8% Poorly correlated | -6.95% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QRHC and PESI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QRHC and PESI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QRHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QRHC | 100% | +0.99% | ||
PESI - QRHC | 26% Poorly correlated | -6.95% | ||
NVRI - QRHC | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
LNZA - QRHC | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.09% | ||
CLH - QRHC | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
GWAV - QRHC | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.31% | ||
More |