Advertisement
LNZA vs MLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNZA is a StrongBuy and MLAC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNZA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LNZA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNZA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LNZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LNZA (@Environmental Services) experienced а -11.24% price change this week, while MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.07%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (-1.39% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
@Financial Conglomerates (+3.46% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| LNZA | MLAC | LNZA / MLAC | |
| Capitalization | 29.7M | 322M | 9% |
| EBITDA | -101.81M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -90.664 | N/A | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 39.9M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 19.6M | 846K | 2,317% |
| Total Debt | 30M | N/A | - |
| LNZA | MLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 3% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 2% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 4% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 3% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 4% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 2% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
Advertisement
LNZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZA | 100% | -2.07% | ||
| HAIUF - LNZA | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ABAT - LNZA | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| MLAC - LNZA | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PESI - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| NVRI - LNZA | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||
MLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLAC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BOWNU - MLAC | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CXAI - MLAC | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| LNZA - MLAC | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
| SOC - MLAC | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.83% | ||
| BOWN - MLAC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||