LNXSF
Price
$30.30
Change
+$2.53 (+9.11%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.91B
MTLHY
Price
$24.64
Change
-$0.46 (-1.83%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNXSF vs MTLHY

Header iconLNXSF vs MTLHY Comparison
Open Charts LNXSF vs MTLHYBanner chart's image
Lanxess Ag
Price$30.30
Change+$2.53 (+9.11%)
Volume$593
Capitalization2.91B
Mitsubishi Chemical Group
Price$24.64
Change-$0.46 (-1.83%)
Volume$201
Capitalization8.58B
LNXSF vs MTLHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNXSF vs. MTLHY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNXSF is a Hold and MTLHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LNXSF: $30.30 vs. MTLHY: $24.64)
Brand notoriety: LNXSF and MTLHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNXSF: 68% vs. MTLHY: 62%
Market capitalization -- LNXSF: $2.91B vs. MTLHY: $8.58B
LNXSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $2.91B. MTLHY’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $8.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNXSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTLHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNXSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTLHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTLHY is a better buy in the long-term than LNXSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNXSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTLHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNXSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTLHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNXSF is a better buy in the short-term than MTLHY.

Price Growth

LNXSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +9.12% price change this week, while MTLHY (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.17% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLHY($8.58B) has a higher market cap than LNXSF($2.91B). LNXSF has higher P/E ratio than MTLHY: LNXSF (20.08) vs MTLHY (12.85). LNXSF YTD gains are higher at: 24.047 vs. MTLHY (-3.750). MTLHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 416B vs. LNXSF (840M). MTLHY has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. LNXSF (1.93B). LNXSF has less debt than MTLHY: LNXSF (4.23B) vs MTLHY (2.3T). MTLHY has higher revenues than LNXSF: MTLHY (4.48T) vs LNXSF (8.06B).
LNXSFMTLHYLNXSF / MTLHY
Capitalization2.91B8.58B34%
EBITDA840M416B0%
Gain YTD24.047-3.750-641%
P/E Ratio20.0812.85156%
Revenue8.06B4.48T0%
Total Cash1.93B330B1%
Total Debt4.23B2.3T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNXSF vs MTLHY: Fundamental Ratings
LNXSF
MTLHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTLHY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNXSF (75). This means that MTLHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LNXSF (100). This means that MTLHY’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

LNXSF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLHY (100). This means that LNXSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLHY’s over the last 12 months.

LNXSF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLHY (59). This means that LNXSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLHY’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNXSF (100). This means that MTLHY’s stock grew significantly faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNXSFMTLHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SETM17.890.17
+0.96%
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
REZ82.980.50
+0.61%
iShares Residential & Multisector RE ETF
DGRO65.220.31
+0.48%
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
FNK53.870.04
+0.07%
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX® ETF
WNDY12.13N/A
N/A
Global X Wind Energy ETF

LNXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNXSF and MTLHY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNXSF and MTLHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNXSF
1D Price
Change %
LNXSF100%
N/A
MTLHY - LNXSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITUY - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KURRY - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLHF - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXCHY - LNXSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+18.32%
More

MTLHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLHY and NDEKY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLHY and NDEKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLHY
1D Price
Change %
MTLHY100%
N/A
NDEKY - MTLHY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
NGVT - MTLHY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
TKCBY - MTLHY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNXSF - MTLHY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLHF - MTLHY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More