LNXSF
Price
$29.05
Change
+$1.31 (+4.72%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.46B
MTLHF
Price
$5.20
Change
+$0.28 (+5.69%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNXSF vs MTLHF

Header iconLNXSF vs MTLHF Comparison
Open Charts LNXSF vs MTLHFBanner chart's image
Lanxess Ag
Price$29.05
Change+$1.31 (+4.72%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization2.46B
Mitsubishi Chemical Group
Price$5.20
Change+$0.28 (+5.69%)
Volume$235
Capitalization7.33B
LNXSF vs MTLHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNXSF vs. MTLHF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNXSF is a Hold and MTLHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (LNXSF: $29.06 vs. MTLHF: $5.20)
Brand notoriety: LNXSF and MTLHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNXSF: 377% vs. MTLHF: 8%
Market capitalization -- LNXSF: $2.46B vs. MTLHF: $7.33B
LNXSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $2.46B. MTLHF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $7.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $225.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNXSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTLHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNXSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTLHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTLHF is a better buy in the long-term than LNXSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNXSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTLHF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNXSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MTLHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTLHF is a better buy in the short-term than LNXSF.

Price Growth

LNXSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.15% price change this week, while MTLHF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +4.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+4.02% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLHF($7.33B) has a higher market cap than LNXSF($2.46B). LNXSF has higher P/E ratio than MTLHF: LNXSF (35.64) vs MTLHF (24.19). LNXSF YTD gains are higher at: 18.950 vs. MTLHF (0.483). MTLHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 553B vs. LNXSF (499M). MTLHF has more cash in the bank: 352B vs. LNXSF (618M). LNXSF has less debt than MTLHF: LNXSF (3B) vs MTLHF (2.09T). MTLHF has higher revenues than LNXSF: MTLHF (4.48T) vs LNXSF (6.36B).
LNXSFMTLHFLNXSF / MTLHF
Capitalization2.46B7.33B34%
EBITDA499M553B0%
Gain YTD18.9500.4833,923%
P/E Ratio35.6424.19147%
Revenue6.36B4.48T0%
Total Cash618M352B0%
Total Debt3B2.09T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNXSF vs MTLHF: Fundamental Ratings
LNXSF
MTLHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7743
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTLHF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNXSF (75). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LNXSF (100). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

LNXSF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLHF (100). This means that LNXSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLHF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as LNXSF (63). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNXSF (100). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew significantly faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNXSFMTLHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OBIOX24.310.11
+0.45%
Oberweis International Opps Inv
COMZX30.130.10
+0.33%
DWS Digital Horizons Inst
AVEGX51.22-0.11
-0.21%
Ave Maria Growth
AMFFX60.38-0.14
-0.23%
American Funds American Mutual F1
THLCX23.95-0.07
-0.29%
Thrivent Large Cap Growth S

LNXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNXSF and MTLHY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNXSF and MTLHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNXSF
1D Price
Change %
LNXSF100%
+4.70%
MTLHY - LNXSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITUY - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KURRY - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.08%
MTLHF - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXCHY - LNXSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
More

MTLHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLHF and NTIC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLHF and NTIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLHF
1D Price
Change %
MTLHF100%
N/A
NTIC - MTLHF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
AZLGF - MTLHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYAM - MTLHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
MITUY - MTLHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXCHF - MTLHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More