LNXSF
Price
$30.15
Change
+$0.47 (+1.58%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.91B
MTLHF
Price
$5.20
Change
+$0.28 (+5.69%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNXSF vs MTLHF

Header iconLNXSF vs MTLHF Comparison
Open Charts LNXSF vs MTLHFBanner chart's image
Lanxess Ag
Price$30.15
Change+$0.47 (+1.58%)
Volume$350
Capitalization2.91B
Mitsubishi Chemical Group
Price$5.20
Change+$0.28 (+5.69%)
Volume$235
Capitalization8.58B
LNXSF vs MTLHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNXSF vs. MTLHF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNXSF is a Hold and MTLHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LNXSF: $30.15 vs. MTLHF: $5.20)
Brand notoriety: LNXSF and MTLHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNXSF: 49% vs. MTLHF: 6%
Market capitalization -- LNXSF: $2.91B vs. MTLHF: $8.58B
LNXSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $2.91B. MTLHF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $8.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNXSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTLHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNXSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTLHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTLHF is a better buy in the long-term than LNXSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNXSF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTLHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNXSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTLHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNXSF is a better buy in the short-term than MTLHF.

Price Growth

LNXSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +5.70% price change this week, while MTLHF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLHF($8.58B) has a higher market cap than LNXSF($2.91B). LNXSF has higher P/E ratio than MTLHF: LNXSF (20.08) vs MTLHF (12.66). LNXSF YTD gains are higher at: 23.433 vs. MTLHF (0.483). MTLHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 416B vs. LNXSF (840M). MTLHF has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. LNXSF (1.93B). LNXSF has less debt than MTLHF: LNXSF (4.23B) vs MTLHF (2.3T). MTLHF has higher revenues than LNXSF: MTLHF (4.48T) vs LNXSF (8.06B).
LNXSFMTLHFLNXSF / MTLHF
Capitalization2.91B8.58B34%
EBITDA840M416B0%
Gain YTD23.4330.4834,851%
P/E Ratio20.0812.66159%
Revenue8.06B4.48T0%
Total Cash1.93B330B1%
Total Debt4.23B2.3T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNXSF vs MTLHF: Fundamental Ratings
LNXSF
MTLHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTLHF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNXSF (75). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LNXSF (100). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

LNXSF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLHF (100). This means that LNXSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLHF’s over the last 12 months.

LNXSF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MTLHF (52). This means that LNXSF’s stock grew similarly to MTLHF’s over the last 12 months.

MTLHF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNXSF (100). This means that MTLHF’s stock grew significantly faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNXSFMTLHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTLHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GABF49.300.32
+0.65%
Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF
IWV362.051.37
+0.38%
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
TRPA39.120.14
+0.36%
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
HIGH23.790.04
+0.17%
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
GWX38.220.02
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF

LNXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNXSF and MTLHY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNXSF and MTLHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNXSF
1D Price
Change %
LNXSF100%
+1.58%
MTLHY - LNXSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITUY - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KURRY - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLHF - LNXSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXCHY - LNXSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTLHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTLHF and NTIC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTLHF and NTIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTLHF
1D Price
Change %
MTLHF100%
N/A
NTIC - MTLHF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
AZLGF - MTLHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYAM - MTLHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
MITUY - MTLHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXCHF - MTLHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+10.46%
More