It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNVGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNVGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNVGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNVGY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LNVGF (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -7.97% price change this week, while LNVGY (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.11%.
LNVGF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
LNVGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
LNVGF | LNVGY | LNVGF / LNVGY | |
Capitalization | 17.8B | 17.8B | 100% |
EBITDA | 3.77B | 3.67B | 103% |
Gain YTD | 11.824 | 21.761 | 54% |
P/E Ratio | 13.54 | 13.89 | 97% |
Revenue | 62.9B | 69.1B | 91% |
Total Cash | 4.24B | 3.67B | 116% |
Total Debt | 3.95B | 3.95B | 100% |
LNVGF | LNVGY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNVGF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as LNVGY (7). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew similarly to LNVGY’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LNVGF (45). This means that LNVGY’s stock grew similarly to LNVGF’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNVGY (98). This means that LNVGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNVGY’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as LNVGF (46). This means that LNVGY’s stock grew similarly to LNVGF’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGY's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as LNVGF (82). This means that LNVGY’s stock grew similarly to LNVGF’s over the last 12 months.
LNVGF | LNVGY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago78% | 11 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago76% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SCHV | 28.96 | 0.13 | +0.45% |
Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF™ | |||
YCS | 46.30 | 0.09 | +0.19% |
ProShares UltraShort Yen | |||
CATF | 50.14 | N/A | N/A |
American Century California Muni Bd ETF | |||
GIGB | 46.95 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
Goldman Sachs Acss Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
TDVI | 28.92 | -0.15 | -0.52% |
FT Vest Tech Div Trgt Inc ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNVGF has been loosely correlated with LNVGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNVGF jumps, then LNVGY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNVGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LNVGF | 100% | -2.87% | ||
LNVGY - LNVGF | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
QUBT - LNVGF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
RCAT - LNVGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -8.71% | ||
CRSR - LNVGF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
VRTK - LNVGF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNVGY has been loosely correlated with LNVGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNVGY jumps, then LNVGF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNVGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LNVGY | 100% | -0.44% | ||
LNVGF - LNVGY | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
DDD - LNVGY | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.60% | ||
CRSR - LNVGY | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
IONQ - LNVGY | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.04% | ||
WDC - LNVGY | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
More |