LNSTY
Price
$28.00
Change
+$0.13 (+0.47%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
57.66B
24 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$88.93
Change
+$1.42 (+1.62%)
Updated
Sep 29, 02:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.21B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNSTY vs NDAQ

Header iconLNSTY vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts LNSTY vs NDAQBanner chart's image
London Stock Exchange Group
Price$28.00
Change+$0.13 (+0.47%)
Volume$1.6M
Capitalization57.66B
Nasdaq
Price$88.93
Change+$1.42 (+1.62%)
Volume$2.06K
Capitalization50.21B
LNSTY vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNSTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNSTY vs. NDAQ commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNSTY is a Hold and NDAQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LNSTY: $28.00 vs. NDAQ: $87.51)
Brand notoriety: LNSTY and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNSTY: 107% vs. NDAQ: 67%
Market capitalization -- LNSTY: $57.66B vs. NDAQ: $50.21B
LNSTY [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $57.66B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $50.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNSTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LNSTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than LNSTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNSTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNSTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LNSTY and NDAQ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LNSTY (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNSTY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.21% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSTY($57.7B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($50.2B). LNSTY has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: LNSTY (44.84) vs NDAQ (33.66). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 14.247 vs. LNSTY (-19.934). NDAQ (9.63B) and LNSTY (9.99B) have identical debt.
LNSTYNDAQLNSTY / NDAQ
Capitalization57.7B50.2B115%
EBITDA4.29BN/A-
Gain YTD-19.93414.247-140%
P/E Ratio44.8433.66133%
Revenue9.14BN/A-
Total Cash3.66BN/A-
Total Debt9.99B9.63B104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNSTY vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
LNSTY
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9821
SMR RATING
1..100
9658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8974
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNSTY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NDAQ (57) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that LNSTY’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNSTY (98) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew significantly faster than LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's SMR Rating (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNSTY (96) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNSTY (88) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LNSTY (89) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNSTYNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNSTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVY141.361.40
+1.00%
iShares Select Dividend ETF
HYTR21.890.03
+0.16%
Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF
PMAP25.68N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April
IBTJ21.92N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Tr ETF
TWM33.98-0.57
-1.65%
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

LNSTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSTY has been loosely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSTY jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSTY
1D Price
Change %
LNSTY100%
+0.47%
MCO - LNSTY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
ICE - LNSTY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
SPGI - LNSTY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
NDAQ - LNSTY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
BGC - LNSTY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.90%
MCO - NDAQ
77%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
MS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
JEF - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
SPGI - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
GS - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
More