LNSTY
Price
$34.40
Change
-$0.61 (-1.74%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
59.89B
4 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$94.84
Change
+$1.34 (+1.43%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
36.33B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNSTY vs NDAQ

Header iconLNSTY vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts LNSTY vs NDAQBanner chart's image
London Stock Exchange
Price$34.40
Change-$0.61 (-1.74%)
Volume$244.82K
Capitalization59.89B
Nasdaq
Price$94.84
Change+$1.34 (+1.43%)
Volume$5.28M
Capitalization36.33B
LNSTY vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNSTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNSTY vs. NDAQ commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNSTY is a Hold and NDAQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LNSTY: $34.40 vs. NDAQ: $94.84)
Brand notoriety: LNSTY and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNSTY: 38% vs. NDAQ: 155%
Market capitalization -- LNSTY: $59.89B vs. NDAQ: $36.33B
LNSTY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $59.89B. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNSTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNSTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than LNSTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNSTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNSTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than LNSTY.

Price Growth

LNSTY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.73% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNSTY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSTY($59.9B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($36.3B). LNSTY has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: LNSTY (59.17) vs NDAQ (29.93). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 23.468 vs. LNSTY (-2.109). LNSTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.38B vs. NDAQ (2B). LNSTY has higher revenues than NDAQ: LNSTY (7.74B) vs NDAQ (6.06B).
LNSTYNDAQLNSTY / NDAQ
Capitalization59.9B36.3B165%
EBITDA3.38B2B169%
Gain YTD-2.10923.468-9%
P/E Ratio59.1729.93198%
Revenue7.74B6.06B128%
Total CashN/A641M-
Total DebtN/A10.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNSTY vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
LNSTY
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5212
SMR RATING
1..100
9664
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6210
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3662
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNSTY's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as NDAQ (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that LNSTY’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNSTY (52) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's SMR Rating (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LNSTY (96) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNSTY (62) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

LNSTY's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NDAQ (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that LNSTY’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNSTYNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNSTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMHB4.640.04
+0.78%
ETRACS 2xMnthly Py Lvrgd US SmCpHiDivETN
EBI52.460.17
+0.32%
The RBB Fund Trust Longview Advantage ETF
BSMU21.490.01
+0.07%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Muncpl Bd ETF
SPAB25.35N/A
N/A
SPDR® Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
ISHG76.00-0.17
-0.22%
iShares 1-3 Year International TrsBd ETF

LNSTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSTY has been loosely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSTY jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSTY
1D Price
Change %
LNSTY100%
-1.74%
MCO - LNSTY
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
ICE - LNSTY
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
SPGI - LNSTY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NDAQ - LNSTY
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
BGC - LNSTY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+1.43%
MCO - NDAQ
74%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
JEF - NDAQ
72%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
MORN - NDAQ
72%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
SF - NDAQ
68%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
MS - NDAQ
68%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
More