LNSPF
Price
$2.63
Change
+$0.02 (+0.77%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
UTGPF
Price
$10.60
Change
-$0.10 (-0.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNSPF vs UTGPF

Header iconLNSPF vs UTGPF Comparison
Open Charts LNSPF vs UTGPFBanner chart's image
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.77%)
Volume$6.02K
Capitalization2.34B
Unite Group Plc (The)
Price$10.60
Change-$0.10 (-0.93%)
Volume$275
Capitalization5.45B
LNSPF vs UTGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNSPF vs. UTGPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNSPF is a Hold and UTGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LNSPF: $2.63 vs. UTGPF: $10.60)
Brand notoriety: LNSPF and UTGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNSPF: 278% vs. UTGPF: 14%
Market capitalization -- LNSPF: $2.34B vs. UTGPF: $5.45B
LNSPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.34B. UTGPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $5.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUTGPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UTGPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LNSPF and UTGPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNSPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTGPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UTGPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNSPF is a better buy in the short-term than UTGPF.

Price Growth

LNSPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.77% price change this week, while UTGPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.93% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UTGPF($5.45B) has a higher market cap than LNSPF($2.34B). UTGPF has higher P/E ratio than LNSPF: UTGPF (27.25) vs LNSPF (7.23). LNSPF YTD gains are higher at: 16.630 vs. UTGPF (1.581). UTGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 193M vs. LNSPF (-477.5M). UTGPF has more cash in the bank: 65.5M vs. LNSPF (23.9M). LNSPF has less debt than UTGPF: LNSPF (1.02B) vs UTGPF (1.38B). UTGPF has higher revenues than LNSPF: UTGPF (271M) vs LNSPF (147M).
LNSPFUTGPFLNSPF / UTGPF
Capitalization2.34B5.45B43%
EBITDA-477.5M193M-247%
Gain YTD16.6301.5811,052%
P/E Ratio7.2327.2527%
Revenue147M271M54%
Total Cash23.9M65.5M36%
Total Debt1.02B1.38B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNSPF vs UTGPF: Fundamental Ratings
LNSPF
UTGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UTGPF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (76). This means that UTGPF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as UTGPF (100). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to UTGPF’s over the last 12 months.

UTGPF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (93). This means that UTGPF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as UTGPF (62). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to UTGPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as UTGPF (93). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to UTGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNSPFUTGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNCL75.810.53
+0.70%
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF
NUMV37.580.14
+0.37%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
EFAA52.04-0.01
-0.02%
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF
IMOM33.65-0.09
-0.26%
Alpha Architect Intl Quant Momt ETF
BYRE25.68-0.16
-0.61%
Principal Real Estate Active Opp ETF

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
UTGPF - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
CGIUF - LNSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UTGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTGPF has been loosely correlated with LSGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTGPF jumps, then LSGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTGPF
1D Price
Change %
UTGPF100%
-0.93%
LSGOF - UTGPF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
FESNF - UTGPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSPF - UTGPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KREVF - UTGPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDPSF - UTGPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More