Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$49.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. LNGZX (53M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (2.84) vs LNGZX (0.91). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (29 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (40.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (35.61) and LNGZX (35.48) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.67 vs. LNGZX (-36.39).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.011 | 34.330 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53M | 99.3M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 2.84 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.48 | 35.61 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.66 | 35.27 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.39 | -2.67 | 1,363% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.08 | 42.14 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement