Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LNGZX vs MCDFX
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts LNGZX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.93
Change+$0.51 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.97M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
LNGZX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LNGZX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNGZX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. LNGZX (50M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: MCDFX (2.83) vs LNGZX (0.94). LNGZX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: LNGZX (29 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. LNGZX (48.00). LNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: LNGZX (2000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.20 vs. LNGZX (23.95). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.82 vs. LNGZX (-36.05).
| LNGZX | MCDFX | LNGZX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.32 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.902 | 27.587 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50M | 97.7M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 2.83 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.95 | 26.20 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.47 | 18.26 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.05 | -8.82 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.66 | 39.01 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement