It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.70% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.28%.
LNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
LNG | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNG | ZTR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 3 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago65% | 4 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 9 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNG has been closely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNG jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZTR and AMT have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZTR and AMT's prices will move in lockstep.