Advertisement
LNDAF vs UFCS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNDAF is a Hold and UFCS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LNDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNDAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LNDAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LNDAF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.02% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| LNDAF | UFCS | LNDAF / UFCS | |
| Capitalization | 1.64B | 785M | 209% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.148 | 9.992 | 302% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.82 | 8.77 | 192% |
| Revenue | 1.04B | 1.32B | 78% |
| Total Cash | 1.02B | 1.19B | 86% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 117M | - |
UFCS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LNDAF | UFCS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 26% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 20% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 21% | 3 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
LNDAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LNDAF and UFCS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNDAF and UFCS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNDAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNDAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| UFCS - LNDAF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| TKOMY - LNDAF | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
| BNT - LNDAF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| PINXF - LNDAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TKOMF - LNDAF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
UFCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UFCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFCS | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| SAFT - UFCS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| CINF - UFCS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| L - UFCS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| ORI - UFCS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| THG - UFCS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
More | ||||