LNDAF
Price
$1.58
Change
+$0.03 (+1.94%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
TKOMF
Price
$41.14
Change
-$6.12 (-12.95%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
83.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNDAF vs TKOMF

Header iconLNDAF vs TKOMF Comparison
Open Charts LNDAF vs TKOMFBanner chart's image
LINEA DIRECTA ASEGURADORA SA
Price$1.58
Change+$0.03 (+1.94%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization1.65B
Tokio Marine Holdings
Price$41.14
Change-$6.12 (-12.95%)
Volume$460
Capitalization83.6B
LNDAF vs TKOMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNDAF vs. TKOMF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNDAF is a Hold and TKOMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LNDAF: $1.58 vs. TKOMF: $41.14)
Brand notoriety: LNDAF and TKOMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNDAF: 178% vs. TKOMF: 2%
Market capitalization -- LNDAF: $1.65B vs. TKOMF: $83.6B
LNDAF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.65B. TKOMF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $83.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTKOMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LNDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TKOMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMF is a better buy in the long-term than LNDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNDAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKOMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNDAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TKOMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNDAF is a better buy in the short-term than TKOMF.

Price Growth

LNDAF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TKOMF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -12.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TKOMF($83.6B) has a higher market cap than LNDAF($1.65B). LNDAF has higher P/E ratio than TKOMF: LNDAF (16.94) vs TKOMF (11.23). LNDAF YTD gains are higher at: 30.148 vs. TKOMF (7.331). TKOMF has more cash in the bank: 1.06T vs. LNDAF (1.02B). TKOMF has higher revenues than LNDAF: TKOMF (7.75T) vs LNDAF (1.04B).
LNDAFTKOMFLNDAF / TKOMF
Capitalization1.65B83.6B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.1487.331411%
P/E Ratio16.9411.23151%
Revenue1.04B7.75T0%
Total Cash1.02B1.06T0%
Total DebtN/A228B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TKOMF: Fundamental Ratings
TKOMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNDAFTKOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TKOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSSCX9.11N/A
N/A
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I
GEIZX18.28N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Index Inv
GGOTX16.29N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth Inv
FTXNX48.69N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Gr Inv
HCAIX113.87-0.19
-0.17%
Harbor Capital Appreciation Inv

LNDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNDAF and UFCS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNDAF and UFCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNDAF
1D Price
Change %
LNDAF100%
N/A
UFCS - LNDAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
TKOMY - LNDAF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
BNT - LNDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
PINXF - LNDAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKOMF - LNDAF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TKOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TKOMF and TKOMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKOMF and TKOMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKOMF
1D Price
Change %
TKOMF100%
N/A
TKOMY - TKOMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
MSADY - TKOMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
MSADF - TKOMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
AFG - TKOMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
SMPNY - TKOMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More