LNC
Price
$38.37
Change
+$0.19 (+0.50%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.23B
80 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$75.32
Change
-$0.97 (-1.27%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.72B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNC vs MET

Header iconLNC vs MET Comparison
Open Charts LNC vs METBanner chart's image
Lincoln National
Price$38.37
Change+$0.19 (+0.50%)
Volume$604
Capitalization7.23B
MetLife
Price$75.32
Change-$0.97 (-1.27%)
Volume$29.35K
Capitalization50.72B
LNC vs MET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNC vs. MET commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNC is a Buy and MET is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (LNC: $38.18 vs. MET: $76.29)
Brand notoriety: LNC and MET are both notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNC: 130% vs. MET: 146%
Market capitalization -- LNC: $7.23B vs. MET: $50.72B
LNC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $7.23B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $50.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $139.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNC is a better buy in the long-term than MET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNC is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +3.55% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.11% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($50.7B) has a higher market cap than LNC($7.23B). MET has higher P/E ratio than LNC: MET (12.95) vs LNC (6.37). LNC YTD gains are higher at: 25.483 vs. MET (-4.815). LNC has less debt than MET: LNC (5.77B) vs MET (19.2B).
LNCMETLNC / MET
Capitalization7.23B50.7B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.483-4.815-529%
P/E Ratio6.3712.9549%
Revenue18.1BN/A-
Total Cash30.1BN/A-
Total Debt5.77B19.2B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNC vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
LNC
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8024
SMR RATING
1..100
9699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a13

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNC's Valuation (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (41). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNC (80). This means that MET’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's SMR Rating (96) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (57). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (87). This means that LNC’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNCMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNWZ24.830.05
+0.21%
TrueShares Eagle Glbl Rnwbls Engy IncETF
AWF11.150.02
+0.18%
ALLIANCEBERSTEIN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
FNGB21.28N/A
N/A
MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs
GDXD2.18-0.02
-0.91%
MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN
MFM5.15-0.05
-0.97%
MFS Municipal Income Trust

LNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNC
1D Price
Change %
LNC100%
-0.21%
PRU - LNC
83%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
MET - LNC
80%
Closely correlated
+3.35%
JXN - LNC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
CNO - LNC
77%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
BHF - LNC
73%
Closely correlated
-3.36%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+3.35%
PRU - MET
83%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
PRI - MET
81%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
CNO - MET
79%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
UNM - MET
79%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
LNC - MET
79%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
More