Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMVVX vs SSGSX
LMVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LMVVX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value R5
Price$29.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.12M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
LMVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMVVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. LMVVX (89.1M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LMVVX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LMVVX (0.00). LMVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LMVVX (7 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than LMVVX (1.10). LMVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). LMVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LMVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.93 vs. LMVVX (-3.56). LMVVX return over 5 years is better than : 9.66 vs. SSGSX (-0.61).
| LMVVX | SSGSX | LMVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.23 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.23 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.290 | -1.701 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.1M | 5.12B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.56 | -2.93 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.79 | 0.24 | 6,697% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.66 | -0.61 | -1,576% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement