Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMVVX vs SSGSX
LMVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LMVVX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value R5
Price$29.82
Change+$0.52 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.72M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
LMVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMVVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. LMVVX (92.7M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LMVVX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LMVVX (0.00). LMVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LMVVX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LMVVX (1.10). LMVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LMVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LMVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). LMVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.93 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). LMVVX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| LMVVX | SSGSX | LMVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.26 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.505 | 2.046 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.7M | 5.64B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.93 | -1.56 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.21 | 3.97 | 458% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.42 | 22.95 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement