LMT
Price
$446.75
Change
+$4.93 (+1.12%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
101.63B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOC
Price
$553.62
Change
+$6.65 (+1.22%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
77.86B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMT vs NOC

Header iconLMT vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts LMT vs NOCBanner chart's image
Lockheed Martin
Price$446.75
Change+$4.93 (+1.12%)
Volume$9.17K
Capitalization101.63B
Northrop Grumman
Price$553.62
Change+$6.65 (+1.22%)
Volume$9.22K
Capitalization77.86B
LMT vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMT vs. NOC commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMT is a StrongBuy and NOC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LMT: $442.14 vs. NOC: $546.89)
Brand notoriety: LMT and NOC are both notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMT: 46% vs. NOC: 29%
Market capitalization -- LMT: $101.63B vs. NOC: $77.86B
LMT [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $101.63B. NOC’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $77.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $304.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $21.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNOC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LMT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NOC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LMT is a better buy in the long-term than NOC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOC is a better buy in the short-term than LMT.

Price Growth

LMT (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -2.27% price change this week, while NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMT is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

NOC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+1.73% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMT($102B) has a higher market cap than NOC($77.9B). LMT has higher P/E ratio than NOC: LMT (24.47) vs NOC (19.64). NOC YTD gains are higher at: 18.081 vs. LMT (-7.037). LMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.6B vs. NOC (6.83B). NOC has more cash in the bank: 1.9B vs. LMT (1.29B). NOC has less debt than LMT: NOC (17B) vs LMT (21.6B). LMT has higher revenues than NOC: LMT (71.8B) vs NOC (40.5B).
LMTNOCLMT / NOC
Capitalization102B77.9B131%
EBITDA7.6B6.83B111%
Gain YTD-7.03718.081-39%
P/E Ratio24.4719.64125%
Revenue71.8B40.5B177%
Total Cash1.29B1.9B68%
Total Debt21.6B17B127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMT vs NOC: Fundamental Ratings
LMT
NOC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5314
SMR RATING
1..100
1535
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1882
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMT's Valuation (9) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (20). This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMT (53). This means that NOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMT’s over the last 12 months.

LMT's SMR Rating (15) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as NOC (35). This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LMT (60). This means that NOC’s stock grew similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.

LMT's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOC (82). This means that LMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMTNOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STK37.290.13
+0.36%
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
IBOT51.510.19
+0.36%
VanEck Robotics ETF
SBAR26.020.08
+0.31%
Simplify Barrier Income ETF
DFIC33.610.02
+0.07%
Dimensional International Core Eq 2 ETF
KJUL31.35N/A
N/A
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF™ Jul

LMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMT has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMT jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMT
1D Price
Change %
LMT100%
+0.67%
LHX - LMT
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
GD - LMT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
NOC - LMT
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
RTX - LMT
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
HII - LMT
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More

NOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOC
1D Price
Change %
NOC100%
+0.25%
RTX - NOC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
LHX - NOC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
GD - NOC
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
HII - NOC
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
LMT - NOC
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More