Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMSIX vs NAESX
LMSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMSIX vs NAESX
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity I
Price$13.58
Change-$0.28 (-2.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.79M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
LMSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMSIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. LMSIX (101M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMSIX: NAESX (1.35) vs LMSIX (1.01). LMSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMSIX (25 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMSIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMSIX: NAESX (3000) vs LMSIX (1000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. LMSIX (1.99). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. LMSIX (38.97).
| LMSIX | NAESX | LMSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.17 | 588% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.17 | 641% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.808 | -4.390 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.35 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | 5.19 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.70 | 31.28 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.97 | 63.19 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.95 | 92.88 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement