Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMNSX vs NAESX
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMNSX vs NAESX
ClearBridge Small Cap I
Price$64.47
Change-$1.17 (-1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.07M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
LMNSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMNSX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMNSX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. LMNSX (683M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMNSX: NAESX (1.35) vs LMNSX (0.69). LMNSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMNSX (31 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMNSX (0.85) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMNSX: NAESX (3000) vs LMNSX (1000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. LMNSX (-0.21). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. LMNSX (34.97).
| LMNSX | NAESX | LMNSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.17 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.17 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.010 | -4.390 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.35 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.21 | 5.19 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.07 | 31.28 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | 63.19 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.46 | 92.88 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement