Advertisement
LMGIF vs WGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGIF is a Hold and WGS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LMGIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LMGIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LMGIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LMGIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LMGIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.20% price change this week, while WGS (@Medical Specialties) price change was +4.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
WGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Medical Specialties (+4.25% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| LMGIF | WGS | LMGIF / WGS | |
| Capitalization | 10.2B | 3.02B | 338% |
| EBITDA | 257M | 54.3M | 473% |
| Gain YTD | 30.719 | 37.848 | 81% |
| P/E Ratio | 51.16 | 1314.13 | 4% |
| Revenue | 727M | 362M | 201% |
| Total Cash | 290M | 135M | 215% |
| Total Debt | 252M | 114M | 221% |
| LMGIF | WGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 13 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VONG | 114.78 | 0.98 | +0.86% |
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |||
| DEMZ | 40.13 | 0.27 | +0.69% |
| Democratic Large Cap Core ETF | |||
| DHDG | 32.24 | 0.15 | +0.45% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF | |||
| XMLV | 62.07 | 0.03 | +0.05% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | |||
| EMHC | 24.80 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| SPDR® Bloomberg EM USD Bd ETF | |||
LMGIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LMGIF and WGS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMGIF and WGS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMGIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMGIF | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| WGS - LMGIF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CFLT - LMGIF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.54% | ||
| MTHRY - LMGIF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
| SGAMY - LMGIF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| DASTY - LMGIF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||
WGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WGS and CDNA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WGS and CDNA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| CDNA - WGS | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| OPK - WGS | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
| ATEN - WGS | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| NTRA - WGS | 25% Poorly correlated | +7.70% | ||
| GCT - WGS | 25% Poorly correlated | +30.52% | ||
More | ||||