LMGDF
Price
$0.91
Change
-$0.01 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
125.92M
OR
Price
$28.66
Change
+$0.81 (+2.91%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.04B
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMGDF vs OR

Header iconLMGDF vs OR Comparison
Open Charts LMGDF vs ORBanner chart's image
Lumina Gold
Price$0.91
Change-$0.01 (-1.09%)
Volume$113.36K
Capitalization125.92M
OR Royalties
Price$28.66
Change+$0.81 (+2.91%)
Volume$859.45K
Capitalization3.04B
LMGDF vs OR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMGDF vs. OR commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGDF is a Hold and OR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LMGDF: $0.91 vs. OR: $28.66)
Brand notoriety: LMGDF and OR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMGDF: 8% vs. OR: 101%
Market capitalization -- LMGDF: $125.92M vs. OR: $3.04B
LMGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $125.92M. OR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LMGDF is a better buy in the long-term than OR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LMGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OR is a better buy in the short-term than LMGDF.

Price Growth

LMGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OR (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

OR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.58% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OR($3.04B) has a higher market cap than LMGDF($126M). LMGDF YTD gains are higher at: 179.816 vs. OR (58.691). OR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.5M vs. LMGDF (-21.38M). OR has more cash in the bank: 75.9M vs. LMGDF (954K). LMGDF has less debt than OR: LMGDF (10.1M) vs OR (200M). OR has higher revenues than LMGDF: OR (247M) vs LMGDF (0).
LMGDFORLMGDF / OR
Capitalization126M3.04B4%
EBITDA-21.38M41.5M-52%
Gain YTD179.81658.691306%
P/E RatioN/A86.33-
Revenue0247M-
Total Cash954K75.9M1%
Total Debt10.1M200M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMGDF vs OR: Fundamental Ratings
LMGDF
OR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
649
SMR RATING
1..100
10087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5092
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMGDF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as OR (90). This means that LMGDF’s stock grew similarly to OR’s over the last 12 months.

OR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMGDF (64). This means that OR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

OR's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as LMGDF (100). This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to LMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

LMGDF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OR (92). This means that LMGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OR’s over the last 12 months.

OR's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as LMGDF (100). This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to LMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMGDFOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDVSX10.290.09
+0.88%
MassMutual Diversified Value R5
USCGX13.830.03
+0.22%
Victory Capital Growth
FFBGX39.880.04
+0.10%
American Funds Global Balanced 529-F-3
DHPYX17.69N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Mid Cap Y
CVTCX52.41-0.14
-0.27%
Calamos Growth & Income C

LMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMGDF has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMGDF jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMGDF
1D Price
Change %
LMGDF100%
N/A
MAG - LMGDF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
MTA - LMGDF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
SA - LMGDF
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
SAND - LMGDF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
OR - LMGDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
More

OR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OR has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OR jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OR
1D Price
Change %
OR100%
+2.91%
AEM - OR
83%
Closely correlated
+4.85%
WPM - OR
82%
Closely correlated
+4.72%
AGI - OR
78%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
KGC - OR
77%
Closely correlated
+3.02%
TFPM - OR
74%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
More